151 Or. App. 546 - Thomas v. Dyer’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
May 2019
most recently cited
2 district ·
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]fter plaintiff began her relationship with Dyer, she did not return to the facility where Dyer worked. None of Dyer's inappropriate conduct occurred in the workplace. Moreover, Mt. Hood's treatment plan for plaintiff did not contemplate social contacts with Dyer, nor is there any evidence that it included counseling of plaintiff by Dyer as a "private counselor." In fact, Dyer failed to inform his employer of the relationship with plaintiff. It is a mere fortuity that Dyer may have rendered counseling to plaintiff during the course of their social relationship. Thus, plaintiff has failed to present any evidence that Dyer, during the period in question, was motivated to serve Mt. Hood[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“conscious effort to keep the relationship secret and the acknowledgment [that he] would lose his job for such behavior definitively establishes both parties knew [he] acted out of personal motives, and not to carry out any employment responsibilities,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“was undertaking a social relationship for his own benefit.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.