State v. Griffith’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
November 2008
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Washington v. Recuenco · 154 Wash. 2d 118 - State v. Hughes · 116 Wash. 2d 917 - State v. Davison · 69 Wash. App. 189 - State v. Johnson · State v. Vickers
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`[C]ulpability for possession of stolen property does not necessarily include culpability for the stealing of the property. The actual thief is guilty of a different crime.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Griffith“[n]othing other than the items bought for around $96 and the diamond ring is ever specifically described by any witness in the record or at the hearing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Griffith“$11,500 of Elaine Linscott's property was identified by John Slaughter as having been in defendant's possession after the crime,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Griffith
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.