State v. Moreno’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
September 2009
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Booker · Blakely v. Washington · RLR v. State · Lynden Transport, Inc. v. State · Sonneman v. Hickel
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“to alter [the] litigation procedures [pertaining to aggravating factors] to ensure that they conform to constitutional guarantees[, and] to order that defendants receive a jury trial on proposed aggravating factors that are not Blakely-compliant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Douglas v. State“were so crucial to the overall functioning of presumptive sentencing that they could not be severed or amended by judicial decision”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Douglas v. State“with the proviso that defendants must receive a jury trial on aggravating factors if mandated by Blakely.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Douglas v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.