Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 151 Pa. Super. 138 - Madison v. Lewis

151 Pa. Super. 138 - Madison v. Lewis’s Empirical Analysis

1942

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
4
states following
November 1994
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently November 1994

6 federal appellate · 16 state decisions

80194219501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 150 Pa. Super. 653 - Jann v. Linton's Lunch · 144 Pa. Super. 231 - Sharpe v. Federal Window & Office Cleaning Co. · 141 Pa. Super. 479 - Mays' Estate · 131 Pa. Super. 349 - Moore v. W. J. Gilmore Drug Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““When a valid marriage is proven the law presumes that it continues until the death of one of the parties (actual or presumptive after seven years), or a divorce is shown. Without either of these appearing if one of the parties marries again, while another presumption arises that it is innocent, that alone is not sufficient to overcome the previously existing presumption of the continued validity of the first marriage. The second presumption does not of itself destroy the first but requires some proof of facts and circumstances to be given the effect of overcoming the first; as for instance, the long lapse of time during which the other party may be presumed to have died, the question of legitimacy of a child of the second marriage, the fact that the other spouse had likewise remarried, proof that the decedent, whose heirs are attacking the second marriage, had himself recognized the validity of it.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.