Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

151 So. 2d 2

Sadowsky v. Levine

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided February 13, 1963

Supreme Court of Florida · decided 1963-02-13

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently November 1988

1 state decisions

Relies on Sadowsky v. Levine

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1963-02-13

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon further consideration of the matter we have determined that the petition is without merit. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged, 135 So.2d 776.

¶2It is so ordered.

TERRELL, Acting C. J., THOMAS, CALDWELL, HOBSON (Ret.), JJ., and SMITH, Circuit Judge, concur.DREW and O’CONNELL, JJ., dissent.
DREW, Justice

¶3(dissenting).

¶4I would grant certiorari and quash the decision of the district court for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of Judge PEARSON, TILLMAN.

¶5O’CONNELL, J., concurs.

/151/so2d/2 · .json · Public domain