151 So. 2d 865 - Perez v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

5 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““We have fully examined the record, and the extensive brief which the appellant personally prepared and filed, and conclude that no showing has been made upon which this appellate court could or should disturb the adjudication of guilt of the offense of receiving and concealing stolen property which was entered pursuant to the defendant’s plea of guilty to that offense. A judgment entered on a plea of guilty ordinarily can not be reviewed by appeal. State ex rel. Baggs v. Frederick, 124 Fla. 290 , 168 So. 252, 253 . The record in this case affords no basis to make exception to that rule.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Ramey v. State