Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 151 SO3D 1025 - Bryant v. State

Bryant v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 625 So. 2d 407 - Gladney v. Clarksdale Beverage Co., Inc. · Johnson v. ST. DOMINICS-JACKSON MEM. HOSP. · Daniels v. State · Martin v. Illinois Central Railroad · Rutland v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When reviewing a motion for a JNOV, the trial judge is required to accept as true all of the evidence that is favorable to the State, including all reasonable inferences that may be drawn therefrom, and to disregard evidence favorable to the defendant.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “We will reverse only where with respect to one or more of the elements of the offense charged, the evidence so considered is such that reasonable and fair minded jurors could only find the accused not guilty.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Substantial evidence is information of such quality and weight that reasonable and fair-minded jurors in the exercise of impartial judgment might have reached different conclusions.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.