McCray v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 2017
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 95 So. 3d 96 - In re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Judicial Administration · 46 So. 3d 654 - Hatfield v. State · Rowe v. Duetche Bank National Trust Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Thus, it appears that computing the additional time allowed after service by mail is now a two-step process. The first step involves determining when the original period would have expired under subdivision (a) of the rule.... In the second step, five days are added to the result of the computation under subdivision (a) .... [Assuming we have correctly construed the rule, the computation methodology described above will apply in a host of different situations, and as this case exemplifies, may yield different results than would have obtained under the former rules.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.