151 So. 3d 679 - Parker v. Schneider’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 538 So. 2d 1001 - Thibodeaux v. Burton · Barnes v. Sun Oil Co. · Sessions & Fishman v. Liquid Air Corp. · 9 So. 3d 815 - Arias v. Stolthaven New Orleans, L.L.C. · 785 So. 2d 880 - Ventura v. Rubio
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In reviewing the confirmation of a default judgment, ‘an appellate court is restricted solely to determining whether the record contains sufficient evidence to support a prima facie case.’ Gresham v. Prod. Mgmt., Inc., 021228, p. 3 (La.App. 4 Cir. 2/11/04), 868 So.2d 171, 175 . ‘This determination is a factual one governed by the manifest error standard of review.’ Arias v. Stolthaven New Orleans, L.L.C., 08-1111, p. 5 (La.5/5/09), 9 So.3d 815, 818 . ‘When the court of appeal finds that a reversible legal error or manifest error of material fact was made in the trial court, the court of appeal is required to determine he facts de novo from the entire record and render a judgment on the merits.’ ” Id.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[a]ffidavits must be based upon the personal knowledge of the affiant”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.