Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 151 SO3D 79 - State v. Williams

State v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Weiland · State Ex Rel. Roland v. State · 134 So. 3d 36 - State v. Lyons · 875 So. 2d 918 - State v. Uloho · State v. Uloho

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “I don’t know if Ms. Sheppard and Mr. Louque [defense counsel] want me to bring in everybody in the neighborhood, ... I don’t know if they want me to bring everybody in, but it is not our obligation. We were not asked to do that. We are asked to prove the elements of each of the crimes beyond a reasonable doubt. We have done that over the course of the last two days. Mr. Louque and Ms. Sheppard had Mr, Bailey under subpoena. They could have—”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.