¶1The appellant was indicted by proper indictment for burglary, and under a correct charge was convicted. There are neither bills of exceptions nor statement of facts. The question attempted to be raised by the motion for new trial cannot be considered without a statement of facts. The judgment is therefore affirmed.
151 S.W. 1182
Noe v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided December 11, 1912
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · decided 1912-12-11
<p>Appeal from Criminal District Court, Dallas County; Barry Miller, Judge. Claude Noe was convicted of burglary, and he appeals.</p>
Affirmed · Decided 1912-12-11