Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 151 SW3D 263 - In Re Orsagh

In Re Orsagh’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
January 2009
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Albertson's, Inc. v. Sinclair · In Re Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. · In Re Union Pacific Resources Co. · Fry v. Tucker · Urbish v. 127th Judicial District Court

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “wherein the judge may be interested, or where either of the parties may be connected with the judge either by affinity or consanguity within such a degree as may be prescribed by law....” Tex. Const, art. V, § 11. After recusing herself, the county court judge”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.