Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 151 SW3D 59 - Grattan v. Union Electric Co.

Grattan v. Union Electric Co.’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Clinkenbeard v. City of St. Joseph · Robbins v. Thies · Gladden v. Missouri Public Service Company · Lexington Utilities Co. v. Parker's Administrator · Erbes v. Union Electric Company

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]f the electric company has not received actual notice that its lines are down, the utility must still discover the danger and cut the power within a reasonable time.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Rule 74 sets out a specific and mandatory procedure to determine whether a dispute exists as to any material facts.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Notice or a lack thereof, of course, affects the amount of time allowed as a”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.