State v. Webb’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently September 2017
20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3663
Relies on United States v. Durham · State v. Stalheim · Montgomery v. State · State v. Jarvis · State v. Merrill
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[r]estitution shall be considered in every case in which a victim of a crime has suffered a material loss or has incurred medical expenses.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. May“[w]hen restitution is not ordered, the court shall set forth on the record its reasons for not ordering restitution.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. May“may not include payments to insurers of direct victims.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.