State v. Venman’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
39 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently October 2017 · most notably State v. Saari (1989), State v. LaBounty (1998)
39 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1320A (§ 1128b of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Solem v. Helm · State v. Roy · United States v. Barrett · State v. Recor
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“it is appropriate for the defendant to renew the motion in order to alert the court of the necessity for reconsidering its original decision. By placing the burden upon the defendant to renew the motion, the standard permits the defendant to reevaluate the issue of prejudice and to elect to proceed with a consolidated trial despite the risk of prejudice. Therefore, failure to renew the motion constitutes a waiver of any right to severance.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Willis · State v. Willis“fair determination of the defendant's guilt or innocence of each offense.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“make this discretionary determination when the relevant facts are known”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.