Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 151 Wash. 363 - Johnson v. Berg

Johnson v. Berg’s Empirical Analysis

1929

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
December 1985
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently December 1985

8 state decisions

301929193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Isaacs v. Holland · Interstate Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Knapp · Leaman v. Thompson · Malloy v. Benway · Johnson v. Berg

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Pleadings should be liberally construed for the purpose of enabling the parties to present their respective contentions to the court to the end that substantial justice may be accomplished. ’ ’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.