Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 151 WASH2D 106 - State v. Ramer

State v. Ramer’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
April 2011
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against Cohen · 102 Wash. 2d 19 - State v. QD · In Re Marriage of Moody · 75 Wash. App. 404 - State v. Linares

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`[A]ppeal is from the superior court's decision, not the commissioner's.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Q. Based on your evaluation and investigation, it's your conclusion that [Ramer] does not possess sufficient information or ability to come to the understanding of what rape of a child meant in terms of his committing the act in this instance? A. Yes. Because at that time of the alleged offense I don't think he did have that understanding.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “CP at 25. Dr. Trowbridge, who evaluated Ramer for the defense, opined that Ramer did not have the capacity to commit the crime charged. Dr. Trowbridge was further of the opinion that Ramer did not understand that sex with someone who consents and likes the sex is wrong. [10] Cain, who performed Ramer's”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.