State v. Thompson’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited
17 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Terry v. Ohio · Wong Sun v. United States · Payton v. New York · Coolidge v. New Hampshire
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“State v. Kinzy, 141 Wash.2d 373, 393 , 5 P.3d 668 (2000) (quoting State v. Ladson, 138 Wash.2d 343, 359 , 979 P.2d 833 (1999)). In determining whether specific evidence is or is not fruit of a tree poisoned by police misconduct, the question is not whether all evidence is”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Thompson“doctrine prohibits admission of any evidence acquired at the Thompson residence. Axiomatic in search and seizure jurisprudence is the unavoidable consequence that a court must suppress”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Thompson“`mutual use of the property by persons generally having joint access or control for most purposes.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Morse
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.