151 Wis. 2d 488 - State v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 35 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently February 2020 · most notably State v. Gallion (2004), 158 Wis. 2d 458 - State v. Johnson (1990)
2 federal appellate · 35 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Morris v. Slappy · Booth v. Maryland · Spaziano v. Florida · South Carolina v. Gathers · 124 Wis. 2d 525 - State v. Dyess
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) Past record of criminal offenses; (2) history of undesirable behavior pattern; (3) the defendant's personality, character and social traits; (4) result of presentence investigation; (5) vicious or aggravated nature of the crime; (6) degree of the defendant's culpability; (7) defendant's demeanor at trial; (8) defendant's age, educational background and employment record; (9) defendant’s remorse, repentance and cooperativeness; (10) defendant's need for close rehabilitative control; (11) the rights of the public; and (12) the length of pretrial detention.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“especially ... in cases such as this, where a minor child has been the victim of a sexual crime, and where the trial court finds that significant incarceration will have a positive influence on the child's recovery from its effects....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“if it is in accordance with legal standards and facts of record, if the trial court undertook a reasonable inquiry and examination of the underlying facts, and if there exists a reasonable basis for the determination.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Tabor · State v. Tabor
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.