Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 151 W. Va. 229 - Adkins v. Minton

151 W. Va. 229 - Adkins v. Minton’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
states following
March 2009
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently March 2009 · most notably 168 W. Va. 306 - Addair v. Bryant (1981), 155 W. Va. 397 - Lambert v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company (1971)

1 federal appellate · 24 state decisions

12019661970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 145 W. Va. 797 - Overton v. Fields · 145 W. Va. 408 - Spurlin v. Nardo · 133 W. Va. 569 - Davis v. Pugh · 146 W. Va. 156 - Graham v. Crist · 148 W. Va. 595 - Richmond v. Campbell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If the driver of a forward vehicle mailing a left turn into a passing lane saw an overtaking vehicle attempting to pass before making the turn and still turned into the left, or passing, lane, and an accident resulted, such driver of the forward or turning vehicle would be guilty of negligence as a matter of law; or if such driver of a forward vehicle looked to the rear’ when an overtaking vehicle was attempting to pass and did not see the overtaking vehicle, such driver of the overtaken vehicle did not look effectively, which is a requisite in such cases, and would still be guilty of negligence as a matter of law. However, if such driver of the overtaken vehicle had looked effectively and had seen the approaching vehicle before the actual attempt to pass was being executed and made a judgment that a left turn could be made with safety and had done so and been struck by the passing vehicle, it would result in a question for jury determination as to negligence and contributory negligence of the respective drivers of the two vehicles.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Ordinarily, when contributory negligence of the plaintiff is relied on as a defense, it is prejudicial error to give for the plaintiff an instruction which directs the jury to find for the plaintiff if certain recited facts are believed by the jury from the evidence, but which instruction does not specifically negative contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff. The error involved in the giving of such erroneous instruction is not corrected by the giving to the jury of other instructions covering contributory negligence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““It has been held that the making of a left turn into a passing lane or across oncoming traffic is the most dangerous movement a vehicle can make on the highway, and the driver of a vehicle making such movement must ascertain if it can be done with safety.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.