Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 152 A3D 408 - In re Kurt H.

In re Kurt H.’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
2
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on In Re Isabella C. · In Re Adner G. · In re T.T.C. · In Re Jermaine H.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The clear and convincing standard of proof requires the trial justice to have a clear conviction without hesitancy of the truth of the precise facts in issue.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.