Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 152 Ariz. 264 - State v. Crotty

State v. Crotty’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
October 2015
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently October 2015

12 state decisions

801986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Baca v. Smith · Hinson v. Coulter · State v. Winegar · Smith v. Cada · Sterling v. Bloom

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The second breath sample in this case was destroyed by appellee, not the police, and not as a result of any affirmative conduct on the part of the police or judicial system.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.