State v. Johnston’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently September 2010
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Williams · State v. Kozlowski · State v. Mitchell · State v. Mitchell · 138 Ill. App. 3d 148 - People v. Eberhardt
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Under authority of A.R.S. § 28-442 , Arizona could have revoked appellee's nonresident privilege to operate his vehicle in Arizona under his valid Montana license. See State v. Mitchell [ 136 Ariz. 386 , 666 P.2d 486 (Ct.App. 1982), aff'd, 136 Ariz. 364 , 666 P.2d 464 (1983)]. There is no evidence, however, that his non-resident driving privileges were not in force at the time he was stopped. Additionally, under the Compact, Montana could have revoked appellee's valid Montana license because of the revocation of his Colorado license, but it did not do so. Accordingly, we cannot conclude that Johnston was driving without a valid license at the time he was stopped . . . ."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ex Parte Welch“"Although states that have signed the Compact can be expected to follow the purposes and requirements of the act, where they fail to do so, in a case such as this, we hold that a person's license remains valid until the driver is properly notified of the revocation and provided with an opportunity for hearing."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ex Parte Welch“In order for the State to show that the defendant was driving while his license was suspended, the evidence must show beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant knew or should have known that the license had been suspended.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Agee
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.