Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 152 Cal. 383 - Spreckels v. Gorrill

Spreckels v. Gorrill’s Empirical Analysis

1907

Citation profile

103
cited by 103 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
7
states following
May 2025
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 94 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 103 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2025 · most notably Kwikset Corp. v. Superior Court (2011), The Edward Barron Estate Co. v. the Woodruff Co. (1912)

2 federal appellate · 94 state decisions

2901907191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Nysewander v. Lowman · Cal. Farm & Fruit Co. v. Schiappa-Pietra · Green v. Duvergey · Mead v. . Bunn · Dow v. Swain

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 103 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"It is also claimed that the complaint is insufficient because of the absence of any showing therein that any pecuniary damages was caused by the fraud. It is true that there is no express allegation that plaintiff suffered pecuniary damage therefrom, but in cases of this character this is not necessary. That fraud which has produced, and will produce, no injury will not justify a rescission, nor support an action either for rescission or damages, is an established principle of law and equity. But there is no rule that the injury must be of such a nature that it can be accurately measured in money. And we know of no rule of pleading which, in an action based upon a rescission between the parties or seeking to enforce such rescission, requires a statement that the fraud complained of had caused or would cause a specific amount of damages.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"If the defendant desired a more explicit statement showing the amount of the pecuniary loss he should have presented the objection by means of a demurrer for uncertainty in that particular.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “this is a suit to enforce a rescission which has been offered and refused, and it is of equitable origin and nature.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.