Gilmore v. Hill’s Empirical Analysis
1957
Citation profile
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 61 Cal. App. 2d 544 - Westphal v. Westphal · 126 Cal. App. 2d 490 - Hernandez v. National Dairy Products Co. · 5 Cal. App. 1 - Ames v. Bell · 96 Cal. App. 2d 717 - Banchero v. Coffis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is not necessary for a party to set forth in a pleading the items of an account therein alleged, but he must deliver to the adverse party, within ten days after a demand thereof in writing, a copy of the account, or be precluded from giving evidence thereof. The court or judge thereof may order a further account when the one delivered is too general, or is defective in any particular. ’ ’”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.