Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 152 CALAPP3D 379 - People v. Schock

People v. Schock’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
2
states following
February 2017
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently February 2017

19 state decisions

1401984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 77B (§ 2 of the Securities Act of 1933)

Relies on Securities & Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co. · S.S. Zoe Colocotroni v. Puerto Rico · United Housing Foundation, Inc. v. Forman · Phillips v. Commissioner · De Leon v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"whether the scheme involves an investment of money in a common enterprise with profits to come solely from the efforts of others." [ Howey ], 328 U.S. at 301 , 66 S.Ct. at 1104 . "The touchstone is the presence of an investment in a common venture premised on a reasonable expectations of profits to be derived from the entrepreneurial or managerial efforts of others." United Housing Foundation, Inc. [v. Forman], 421 U.S. 837, 852 , 95 S.Ct. 2051, 2060 , 44 L.Ed.2d 621 (1975).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The touchstone is the presence of an investment in a common venture premised on a reasonable expectations of profits to be derived from the entrepreneurial or managerial efforts of others.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.