Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

152 F. 1022

Docket No. 701.

Dillingham v. Bakley

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided May 7, 1907.)

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1907-05-07

<p>Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk.</p>

2 counsel of record

Relies on Ex parte Bakley

Cited in Bouvier (1914)’s definition of “Enlistment”

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1907-05-07

¶1Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk.

¶2L. L. Lewis, U. S. Atty. (Ro. H. Talley, Asst. U. S. Atty., on the brief), for appellant.

¶3Mary Phil-brook, for appellees.

¶4Before PRITCHARD, Circuit Judge, and MeDOWELL, District Judge.

¶5PER CURIAM.

¶6We have carefully considered the questions involved in this case, and' we find no error in the rulings of the learned judge who tried the case below. Therefore we affirm the judgment of the court below, fully concurring in the opinion, which is to be found in 148 Fed. 56.

/152/f1d/1022 · .json · Public domain