Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 152 F.1d 801 - Fowler v. Gowing

Fowler v. Gowing’s Empirical Analysis

152 F. 801 · 1907

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
June 1944
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently June 1944

5 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

3019071910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In Re the Accounting of Totten · Beaver v. . Beaver · National Bank v. Case · Pauly v. State Loan & Trust Co. · King v. . Talbot

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Persons holding stock as executors, administrators, guardians, or trustees, shall not be personally subject to any liabilities as stockholders; but the estates and funds in their hands shall be liable in like manner and to the same extent as the testator, intestate, ward, or person interested in such trust funds would be, if living and competent to act and hold the stock in his own name.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““The fact that the trust estate was wiped out of existence, so far as value or financial responsibility is concerned, by the' failure of the . bank, is no reason or justification for looking to the trustee personally. The opinion of Judge Coxe, in Lucas v. Coe (C. C.) 86 F. 972 , is quite clear'and emphatic on that proposition.’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.