In re Isler’s Empirical Analysis
152 F.2d 1002 · 1946
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently May 2015
1 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hemphill Co. v. Coe · In re Allen · In re Langsner · In re Lawson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Under the statute our jurisdiction is limited in cases of this character to a review of ‘the evidence produced before the commissioner,’ and our revision must be ‘confined to the points set forth in the reasons of appeal’, Section 4914, R.S. (U.S. C., title 35, sec. 62 [ 35 U.S.C.A. § 62 ]). “Obviously we may not, in deciding this case, consider facts affecting its merits occurring after appellant’s appeal was taken.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.