In re Fullam’s Empirical Analysis
152 F.2d 141 · 1945
Citation profile
18 federal appellate · 4 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently March 1980 · most notably Ketcherside v. United States (1963), Boyden v. Commissioner of Patents (1971)
18 federal appellate · 4 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miller v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““the in forma pauperis statute makes no provision requiring the District Court or the clerk thereof to furnish an indigent litigant with copies of papers or records,”.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Perkins v. Rich“The Statute “applies only to court costs”.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Perkins v. Rich
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.