Kalwar v. McKinnon’s Empirical Analysis
152 F.2d 263 · 1945
Citation profile
18
cited by 18 later decisions
3
states following
October 1956
most recently cited
9 federal appellate · 3 district · 4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Yakus v. United States · United States v. White · Bowles v. Griffin · Desper v. Warner Holding Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is clear, we think that the figure put down by the landlord as the rent he was receiving on the freeze date does not become, even tentatively, the legal maximum rent. If the landlord makes a false statement in the registration statement, or if he neglects to file a registration statement, he may be subject to criminal penalties under § 205 (b) of the Act; * * * in any litigation where the point becomes relevant the rent which was actually being charged on the freeze date must be factually determined. * * * If he (the landlord) specifies it incorrectly, he does not thereby establish the maximum legal rent at the asserted figure.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““Section 4. Maximum rents. — This section establishes separate maximum rents for different terms of occupancy (daily, weekly or monthly) and numbers of occupants of a particular room. Maximum rents for rooms in a hotel or rooming house (unless and until changed by the Administrator as provided in section 5) shall be: “(a) Rented or regularly offered during maximum rent period. — For a room rented or regularly offered for rent during the thirty days ending on the maximum rent date, the highest rent for each term or number of occupants for which the room was rented during that thirty-day period, or, if the room was not rented or was not rented for a particular term or number of occupants during that period, the rent for each term or number of occupants for which it was regularly offered during such period. “(b) First rented or regularly offered after maximum rent period. — For a room neither rented nor regularly offered for rent during the thirty days ending on the maximum rent date, the highest rent for each term or number of occupants for which the room was rented during the thirty days commencing when it was first offered for rent after the maximum rent date; or, if the room was not rented or was not rented for a particular term or number of occupants during that period, the rent for each term or number of occupants for which it was regularly offered during such period. “(c) First rent after maximum rent date where no maximum rent established under (a) or (b). — For a room r”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hansen v. Creedon
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.