Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

152 F.2d 658

Docket No. 102.

Boyce v. Seas Shipping Co.

Second Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Dec. 19, 1945.

Second Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1945-12-19

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1945-12-19

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently December 1974

6 federal appellate ·

1001945195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Silas B. Axtell, of New York City (Lucien V. Axtell, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

¶2Paul L. Murphy and Frank V. Barns, both of New York City, for appellee.

¶3Before L. HAND, AUGUSTUS N. HAND, and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5The libellant testified that he slipped upon the floor of the pantry of the ship on which he was serving as a steward, while carrying some glasses to the officers’ dining room; the floor of the pantry being at the time “sloppy and full of grease, and the ship was rolling.” We may assume for argument that there are occasions when a ship may be liable for an oily or greasy pantry floor; but, if so, this was not shown to have been one. It is impossible to say» from the libellant’s testimony how long the condition had existed of which he complained. The judge’s finding of fact was not “clearly erroneous” that “there was no credible evidence in this case that either the galley or alley-way was wet or greasy, and that the defendant had actual or imputed notice thereof.”

¶6Decree affirmed.

/152/f2d/658 · .json · Public domain