Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 152 F.2d 706 - Cannon v. Parker

Cannon v. Parker’s Empirical Analysis

152 F.2d 706 · 1945

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
November 1988
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently November 1988

1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

3019451950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 201 (American Samoa Labor Standards Amendments of 1956)

Relies on Sprage v. Ticonic Nat Bank · Trustees v. Greenough · Central Railroad Banking Co of Georgia v. Pettus · Krueger v. United States · Oelrichs v. Spain

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Plaintiffs as pledgees of stock were seeking to have improper withdrawals of corporate assets restored after a full audit should determine them, and to take the assets from the unfaithful officers and protect them by a receiver if found necessary.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.