Auguste v. Reno’s Empirical Analysis

152 F.3d 1325 · 1998

Citation profile

cited by 15 later decisions

May 2005

most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 8 U.S.C. § 1105A (§ 106 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1187 (§ 217 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Yueh-Shaio Yang · Lalani v. Perryman · Ramallo v. Reno · Boston-Bollers v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Hose v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“Except as provided in this section and notwithstanding any other provision of law, no court shall have jurisdiction to hear any cause or claim by or on behalf of any alien arising from the decision or action by the Attorney General to commence proceedings, adjudicate cases, or execute removal orders against any alien under this chapter.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. Richardson v. Reno · 24 F. Supp. 2d 406 - Saccoh v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
“An alien may not be provided a waiver [of a visa requirement] under [the VWPP] unless the alien has waived any right— (1) to review or appeal under this chapter of an immigration officer’s determination as to the admissibility of the alien at the port of entry into the United States, or (2) to contest, other than on the basis of an application for asylum, any action for removal of the alien.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. 29 F. Supp. 2d 660 - Tsukamoto v. Radcliffe
“shall apply without limitation to claims arising from all past, pending, or future exclusion, deportation, or removal proceedings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. Henderson v. Immigration and Naturalization Service Navas

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.