Cardwell v. Greene’s Empirical Analysis
152 F.3d 331 · 1998
Citation profile
27 federal appellate · 8 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 100 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2012 · most notably Michael Wayne Williams v. John Taylor Warden (2000), Aycox v. Lytle (1999)
27 federal appellate · 8 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Appellate journey
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Townsend v. Sain · Lindh v. Murphy · Keeney v. Tamayo-Reyes · In re Geschke
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 100 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“between de novo review and 'reasonableness' review [] insignificant.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Wilson v. Moore · No. 98-6577“(A) the claim relies on— (i) a new rule of constitutional law, made retroactive to cases on collateral review by the Supreme Court, that was previously unavailable; or (ii) a factual predicate that could not have been previously discovered through the exercise of due diligence; and (B) the facts underlying the claim would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that but for constitutional error, no reasonable fact finder would have found the applicant guilty of the underlying offense.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.