Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 152 F.3d 596 - 77748 Snyder

77748 Snyder’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
August 2018
most recently cited

3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently August 2018 · most notably Scott v. E W R, Structured Asset Services, L.L.C. v. Self (In Re Self) (2005)

3 district ·

210199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Smiley v. First National Bank of Belleville · In the Matter of Robert P. Krehl, Debtor-Appellant · Dekalb County Division of Family & Children Services v. Platter · Unr Industries Inc Schwartz Cooper Kolb Gaynor Chartered · Snyder

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(2) with intent to hinder, delay or defraud a creditor or an officer of the estate charged with custody of property under this title, has transferred, removed, destroyed, mutilated, or concealed, or has permitted to be transferred, removed, destroyed, mutilated, or concealed— (A) property of the debtor, within one year before the date of the filing of the petition...”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(1) that the act complained of was done within one year prior to the date of petition filing; (2) the act was that of the debtor; (3) it consisted of a transfer, removal, destruction, or concealment of the debt- or’s property; and (4) it was done with an intent to hinder, delay, or defraud either a creditor or an officer of the estate.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Proof of harm is not a required element of a cause of action under Section 727.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.