Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

152 F. App'x 293

Howell v. Stansberry

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided October 28, 2005

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2005-10-28

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on In Re: Byron Jones, A/K/A Carl Lee, A/K/A B, Movant

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion · Decided 2005-10-28

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Mauricio Lopez Howell, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000), and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Howell v. Stansberry, No. CA-05-119-5-BO (E.D.N.C. *294 Apr. 21, 2005; filed June 9, 2005 & entered June 17, 2005); see also In re Jones, 226 F.3d 328, 333-34 (4th Cir.2000) (discussing circumstances under which § 2241 may be used to test legality of conviction). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 AFFIRMED

/152/fappx/293 · .json · Public domain