Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 152 Fla. 367 - Savage v. State

Savage v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1943

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
1
states following
December 1996
most recently cited

42 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently December 1996 · most notably State v. Allen (1976), 56 So. 2d 543 - Preston v. State (1952)

42 state decisions

180194319501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bessie Cannon v. State of Florida · Russ v. State · Goddard v. State · Frank v. State · Austin v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a gross and flagrant character, evincing reckless disregard of human life or of the safety of persons exposed to its dangerous effects; or that entire want of care which would raise the presumption of indifference to consequences; or such wantonness or recklessness or grossly careless disregard of the safety and welfare of the public, or that reckless indifference to the rights of others, which is equivalent to an intentional violation of them.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “While the operation of the automobile at the time and place and under the circumstances enumerated may be reckless indifference to the rights of others or such wantonness or recklessness or gross careless disregard of the safety and welfare of the public, it has not by the testimony appearing in this record been made so to appear.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “so strong, cogent, and convincing as to exclude every reasonable hypothesis except that of the defendant's guilt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.