Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 152 Fla. 437 - Loftin v. Skelton

Loftin v. Skelton’s Empirical Analysis

1943

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
2
states following
June 1967
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently June 1967

2 federal appellate · 13 state decisions

80194319501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Western v. Henderson · Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. Myrick · Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. v. Webb · A.C.L.R.R. Co. v. Voss A.C.L.R.R. Co. v. Redemptorists · Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. Thompson ex rel. Budamire

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In a controverted issue such as is presented here, when the plaintiff puts on his evidence to support his charge of negligence and forthwith the defendant responds with evidence showing that it exercised ordinary and reasonable care and diligence, the presumption is out of the picture and is as if it were never in the statute. If there are conflicts in the evidence, it becomes the duty of the jury to reconcile them and reach a verdict without any reference whatever to the presumption created by the statute. Any suggestion to the jury that it then exists is prejudicial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “* * * it is error to make any reference whatever to the presumption.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.