152 F. Supp. 492 - Rigby v. Mitchell’s Empirical Analysis
1957
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
February 1960
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Relationships
Applies 7 U.S.C. § 1281 (Agricultural Act of 1948) · 7 U.S.C. § 1282 · 7 U.S.C. § 1331 · 7 U.S.C. § 1335 · 7 U.S.C. § 1365
Relies on Boske v. Comingore · Crawford v. Hubbell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““past acreage of wheat, tillable acres, crop-rotation practices, type of soil, and topography.” Id., subsection (c).”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““With prior approval of the State committee, the 1955 base acreage, or the 1954 base acreage if appropriate for 1956 due to the crop-rotation system established for the farm, determined for the farm under the regulations issued by the Secretary for establishing farm acreage allotments for the respective years ( 18 F.R. 3161 ; 19 F.R. 3250 ) may be used as the 1956 base acreage for the farm if the county committee determines that such use will result in a base acreage for 1956 which meets the requirements prescribed above.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.