152 F. Supp. 2d 1317 - Borgner v. Brooks’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Central Hudson Gas Electric Corporation v. Public Service Commission of New York · Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel of the Supreme Court of Ohio · Edenfield v. Fane · Peel v. Attorney Registration & Disciplinary Commission of Illinois · Ibanez v. Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation Board of Accountancy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“in implant dentistry — regardless of whether respondents know the credentialing agency or not — will persuade much of the public that such dentists are worthy, capable, and trustworthy. Such advertising will confer a professional advantage upon dentists who advertise themselves as credentialed by organizations that are not accepted by the American Dental Association. (emphasis added) The district court concluded the”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Borgner v. Brooks“... (NAME OF REFERENCED ORGANIZATION)... IS NOT RECOGNIZED AS A BONA FIDE SPECIALTY ACCREDITING ORGANIZATION BY THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION OR THE FLORIDA BOARD OF DENTISTRY.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Borgner v. Brooks“... (NAME OF ANNOUNCED AREA OF DENTAL PRACTICE) ... IS NOT RECOGNIZED AS A SPECIALTY AREA BY THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION OR THE FLORIDA BOARD OF DENTISTRY.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Borgner v. Brooks
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.