Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

152 Ga. 496

Hulse v. Starke

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 12, 1922

Supreme Court of Georgia · decided 1922-01-12

<p>Writ of error; from Bichmond superior court.</p>

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently October 1941

3 state decisions

Relies on Burress v. Montgomery

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1922-01-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Atkinson, J.

¶11. This is an action at law on a contract, to recover an amount alleged to be due by the defendant upon demands based on performance of the contract by plaintiffs. The Court of Appeals, and no-t the Supreme Court, has jurisdiction. The prayer that the defendant be required to produce certain documents on the trial does not convert the c'ase into an equitable action.

¶2'2. The ease, being of the character indicated in the preceding note, will *497be transferred to the Court of Appeals for decision. See Burress v. Montgomery, 148 Ga. 548 (97 S. E. 538).

No. 2404.January 12, 1922.Writ of error; from Bichmond superior court.Isaac S. Peebles Jr., for plaintiffs in error.C. II. & B. 8. Cohen, contra.

¶3Transferred to Court of Appeals.

All the Justices concur.
/152/ga/496 · .json · Public domain