152 Ind. App. 280 - Coakley v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

20 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““. . . [I]f . . . [the Defendant] thinks misconduct is of such a character that the damage cannot be repaired by any action of the court, [then Defendant should] move to discharge the jury or take such other steps as he may think will secure to him a fair trial. If he fails to do this, and permits the case to proceed to final determination, he must be deemed to have waived all questions arising out of such alleged misconduct.””

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 154 Ind. App. 482 - Moore v. State · 153 Ind. App. 648 - Palmer v. State

2. “"Hearsay evidence has been defined as testimony by a witness in a judicial proceeding relative to an extrajudicial declaration by another and which is offered for the purpose of proving the facts asserted by the declarant. Wayne Works v. Hicks Body Co. (1944), 115 Ind. App. 10 , 55 N.E.2d 382 ; Griffith v. Thrall (1941), 109 Ind. App. 141 , 29 N.E.2d 345 . For testimony to be inadmissible as hearsay, it is necessary that the extrajudicial declaration be offered to prove the `facts asserted by the declarant.'" Trustees of Indiana University v. Williams (1969), 252 Ind. 624 , 251 N.E.2d 439, 443 .”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 169 Ind. App. 478 - GOLD BOND BLDG. PROD. DIV., ETC. v. Review Bd., Ind. · Gold Bond Building Products Division National Gypsum Co. v. Review Board of Indiana Employment Security Division