152 Ind. App. 408 - Paschall v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

23 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““A recent line of cases brings us to the conclusion that the maximum sentence for Entering to Commit a Felony is not less than one nor more than five years. This is a lesser included offense under the Second Degree Burglary statute, IC 1971, 35-13-4-4; § 10-701 (b) (Burns 1956), which carries not less than two nor more than five years. “Landaw v. State (1972), 258 Ind. 67 , 279 N. E. 2d 230 ; Easton v. State (1972), 258 Ind. 204 , 280 N. E. 2d 307 ; Heathe v. State (1971), 257 Ind. 345 , 274 N. E. 2d 697 ; Hobbs v. State (1969), 253 Ind. 195 , 252 N. E. 2d 498 . “In accordance with the above cases, this cause is remanded to the trial court with the direction to enter a corrected judgment for commitment nunc pro tunc for not less than one nor more than five years.” Paschall, supra, 283 N. E. 2d at 804 .”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Goodwin v. State

2. ““Under the circumstances it is universally recognized a finger, palm or bare footprint found in the place where a crime was committed may be sufficient proof of identity.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Kimmel v. State