Stimec v. Verderber’s Empirical Analysis
1940
Citation profile
4 district · 18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently February 1976
4 district · 18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Martindale v. Battey · Shelley v. Sentinel Life Insurance · Kaw Valley State Bank v. Thompson · Clark v. Layman · Brown v. Kirkbride
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““. . . [T]he doctrine of res judicata not only prevents the relitigation of identical facts and questions a second time but bars the litigation of all matters in a subsequent action which might and should have been determined in the first one (citing cases).” (p. 750)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Coffey v. Gilbert
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.