Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 152 KY 120 - Stewart v. Gardner

Stewart v. Gardner’s Empirical Analysis

1913

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
2
states following
June 1977
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently June 1977

20 state decisions

601913192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kulenkamp v. Groff · Allen v. Thompson · Cherry v. Mitchell · Citizens' Bank v. Millet

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In the instant case the defendants are sensible, intelligent men. They knew when they executed the notes that they were entering into an unconditional promise to pay the money therein specified. They did not allege or prove by clear and convincing evidence that any fraud was practiced on them, or that the notes were executed by mistake. It is simply an attempt to vary the terms of two written contracts by contemporaneous parol declarations. This cannot be done.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.