Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 152 LA 241 - State v. Coco

State v. Coco’s Empirical Analysis

1922

Citation profile

60
cited by 60 later decisions
1
states following
December 1966
most recently cited

60 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently December 1966 · most notably State Ex Rel. Nobles v. Bienville Parish School Board (1941), Vander Sluys v. Finfrock (1925)

60 state decisions

46019221930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Rogers · Grinage v. Times-Democrat Publishing Co. · Gruner v. Police Jury

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““That the word ‘liquor’ or - the phrase ‘intoxicating liquor,’ wherever used in this act, shall be construed to include, alcohol, whisky, brandy, rum, gin, beer, ale, porter,” etc., “by whatever name Galled.” (Italics ours).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'“The Legislature shall never adopt any system or code of laws by general reference to such system or code of laws; but in all cases shall recite at length the several provisions of the laws it may enact.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““That nothing in this act shall be construed to forbid the possession of intoxicating liquors in one’s private dwelling or abode while the same is occupied by him as such a dwelling, provided such intoxicating liquors were legally acquired and áre only for personal consumption by the owner thereof and his family residing in such dwelling and his bona fide guest when entertained by him therein. “Nothing in this act shall be construed to prevent a citizen who is a householder from brewing beer and fermenting wine for the use of himself and his family in his home and his bona fide guest entertained in such home.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.