State v. Crow

¶1Appellant was prosecuted under a bill of information for having intoxicating liquor in his possession for beverage purposes, in /violation of Act 39 of 1921 (Ex. Sess.) p. 42. The issue presented is the same as in the ease of State v. Cleary (No. 25318) 92 South. 892,1 decided to-day. For the reasons given in that case,

¶2The conviction and sentence appealed from are affirmed.