Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 152 LA 795 - Shipp v. Bordelon

Shipp v. Bordelon’s Empirical Analysis

1922

Citation profile

119
cited by 119 later decisions
1
states following
October 1997
most recently cited

117 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 119 later decisions — most recently October 1997 · most notably Byas v. Hotel Bentley, Inc. (1924), Reeves v. Globe Indemnity Co. of New York (1936)

117 state decisions

32019221930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 119 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Hence we see that it is not enough that the employee shall be performing work of the character falling within the designated trades, businesses, or occupations, but it must be done ‘in the course of the employer’s trade,’ etc., in certain trades, businesses, etc. In other words, the work must be of that character, and the employer must be engaged in that line of work as a trade, business, or occupation, in order that the act may apply. It is not pretended that the defendant was engaged, as a trade, business, or occupation, in the building, repairing, etc., of houses or other structures, but merely found it necessary to repair a certain building on his farm.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““It is not enough that the work done should be hazardous if it be not also incident to or in the course of the trade, business or occupation of the employer which is within itself hazardous under the statute.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Every person performing services arising out of and incidental to his employment in the course of his employer's trade, business or occupation in the following hazardous trades, businesses and occupations:”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.