Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 152 Md. App. 488 - Hudson v. State

152 Md. App. 488 - Hudson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
1
states following
May 2021
most recently cited

36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently May 2021 · most notably 191 Md. App. 319 - Wilder v. State (2010), 182 Md. App. 114 - Tate v. State (2008)

36 state decisions

270200320102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · United States v. Powell · Dorsey v. State · Demos v. Supreme Court of Washington · Hunt v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Tjhere is no inconsistency either between the acquittal on the first degree premeditated murder count and the convic tion for conspiring to commit first degree murder or, obversely, an acquittal on a conspiracy charge and the conviction of first degree murder. These offenses are separate and distinct.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]o reverse an inconsistent conviction would not only require guesswork about what produced the inconsistency, but would also be unfair to the State, which cannot appeal an inconsistent acquittal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Consistency has never been a requisite attribute of a jury verdict. Continuing the common law tradition, “inconsistent verdicts in a jury trial [ ] are generally tolerated under Maryland law.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.